The demographic transformation occurring across the United States represents one of the most significant social shifts of our time. This transformation is particularly evident in Midwest communities, where immigrant families are building new lives in areas historically unaccustomed to linguistic and cultural diversity. This demographic evolution has created both opportunities and obstacles, particularly within educational systems tasked with serving English Language Learners (ELLs) in resource-constrained rural environments.
Recent decades have witnessed unprecedented growth in immigrant populations settling in rural locations previously characterized by demographic homogeneity (Kandel et al., 2011; Lee & Hawkins, 2015; Martinez Negrette, 2020). This shift has generated significant social and economic ramifications, as rural communities find themselves unprepared to support non-English speaking populations. The consequences extend across multiple domains, from communication barriers to inadequate access to essential services, including healthcare and education (Coady, 2020; Lee & Hawkins, 2015; Majka & Majka, 2011).
The educational implications of this demographic transition are particularly acute. Rural education exemplifies what scholars term “spatial injustice”—systematic disparities in resources and opportunities directly correlated with geographic location (Tieken, 2017). Within this context, ELLs, their educators, and rural schools have been consistently marginalized in educational policy discussions and research initiatives (Lavalley, 2018; Pendola & Fuller, 2018; Schaefer et al., 2016). Recent data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, 2024) underscore the urgency of addressing these disparities. Since 2022, ELLs have experienced a five-point decline in both reading and mathematics scores, significantly exceeding the two-point decline observed among non-ELs. These achievement gaps reflect longstanding research on systemic inequalities affecting students from marginalized racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and linguistic backgrounds (Ladson-Billings, 1994/2006; Gay, 2010)—inequalities that become magnified within rural educational contexts.
Illinois as a Case Study
Illinois presents a compelling case study for examining these challenges. As the Midwest’s most populous state, with over 12.7 million residents, Illinois encompasses 102 counties, two-thirds of which lie outside metropolitan areas. The state’s robust agricultural economy—centered on corn and soybean production—alongside significant manufacturing and food processing industries, has attracted substantial immigrant populations to rural communities. As a sanctuary state experiencing continued immigration growth, Illinois faces the dual challenge of supporting newcomer populations while addressing the infrastructural limitations of rural educational systems.
This demographic shift has introduced unprecedented challenges for both immigrant communities and established rural populations (Garibay & Vonderlack-Navarro, 2024; Martinez Negrette, 2020). Despite steady increases in immigrant student enrollment over the past decade, rural Illinois school districts frequently lack the resources necessary to effectively support ELLs and students of immigrant origin.
Identifying Critical Challenges
Research has identified four fundamental challenges confronting rural Illinois education systems. First, the expanding ELL population necessitates substantial modifications to instructional practices to address students’ social and academic needs (Yun & Kinkley, 2019). Second, rural schools often lack the infrastructure required to develop comprehensive English as a Second Language (ESL) programs, leaving educators without essential tools for effective student support (Ruecker, 2020). Third, teachers report significant gaps in their preparation and professional development, particularly regarding ELL-specific instruction (Soltero et al., 2019). Fourth, educators demonstrate limited knowledge of culturally responsive teaching methods essential for engaging ELLs and addressing their comprehensive needs (Garibay & Vonderlack-Navarro, 2024). Statistical data from the Illinois State Board of Education (2023) confirm these challenges translate into measurable academic disparities for rural ELLs.
Reframing the Discourse
Addressing educational disparities for rural ELLs requires moving beyond surface-level solutions to examine the deeper structural foundations that perpetuate unequal outcomes. Rather than viewing inequality as simply a matter of test scores or graduation rates, we must recognize it as a complex phenomenon rooted in educational systems that lack appropriate linguistic and cultural frameworks. This understanding illuminates how persistent achievement gaps reflect broader patterns of power distribution and systematic marginalization within school environments (De Jong & Harper, 2005; Ruecker, 2020).
The reality for many ELLs in rural Illinois involves interaction with teaching professionals who lack adequate preparation for multilingual instruction (Soltero et al., 2019). This preparation gap often originates from broader deficiencies within educator training programs and ongoing professional development initiatives (Acosta & Sanczyk, 2019). When schools fail to provide specialized language-focused and culturally appropriate supports, students often struggle with classroom engagement, face obstacles in developing strong literacy skills, and encounter barriers to sustained academic success.
Compelling evidence, however, reveals a different narrative: ELLs who benefit from consistent, rigorous instruction that incorporates both English development and home language maintenance often demonstrate superior academic performance compared to their monolingual counterparts (Cheung & Slavin, 2012; Thomas & Collier, 2012; Bialystok, 2007). This evidence fundamentally challenges deficit-oriented thinking and highlights the tremendous potential within multilingual student populations.
A Path Forward
Addressing these challenges requires repositioning ELLs as valuable educational assets rather than institutional burdens. As we reflect on the progress and challenges of 2025, and look ahead to the opportunities of 2026, this paradigm shift becomes even more urgent. It demands comprehensive support for both in-service and pre-service educators through continuous exemplification of appropriate pedagogical models and the implementation of professional development grounded in culturally and linguistically responsive methodologies. Such preparation must enhance educators’ capacity to distinguish among students’ language acquisition processes, cognitive abilities, and educational needs, thereby promoting equitable instructional practices and mitigating persistent academic disparities (De Jong & Harper, 2005).
The commitment to supporting rural educators requires a fundamental reimagining of educational equity in geographically isolated communities. As we move forward into 2026, educational systems must prioritize ongoing educator support while maintaining deliberate focus on both language and academic development. This will be essential to dismantling structural barriers and ensuring equitable opportunities for all students. This transformation requires acknowledging that rural communities, despite their challenges, possess unique strengths and resources. Success depends upon building collaborative partnerships between educators, researchers, community members, and immigrant families—partnerships that recognize the linguistic and cultural assets students bring to educational environments while addressing systemic barriers that limit their academic success. The future of rural education—and of the rural communities increasingly shaped by immigrant populations—depends on our collective response.
The demographic changes reshaping rural America are irreversible. The question facing educational leaders is not whether to adapt, but how quickly and effectively they can implement the changes necessary to serve all students equitably. As we move into 2026, the charge is clear: we must commit to transforming educational structures, centering linguistic and cultural diversity as strengths, and investing in sustained, equity-oriented educator preparation. Anything less risks perpetuating disparities that for too long have defined the educational trajectories of ELLs. Now is the time for courageous leadership, research-informed practice, and unwavering advocacy that positions every student as central to the future of American education.
References
Acosta, J. K., & Sanczyk, A. (2019). Language or cognition? Using culturally responsive
teaching with English language learners. Urban Education Research & Policy Annuals,
6(2), 45-61.
Bialystok, E. (2007). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to
cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 210–223.
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). Effective reading programs for English language learners and other language-minority students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 351–395.
Coady, M. R. (2020). Rural English learner education: A review of research and call for a national agenda.Journal of Rural Education, 36(1), 1-18.
De Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English-language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101–124.
Garibay, A., & Vonderlack-Navarro, R. (2024). Serving newcomer students: Voices from the field. Illinois School Board Journal, 112(1), 21-25.
Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kandel, W., Henderson, J., Koball, H., & Capps, R. (2011). Moving up in rural America: Economic attainment of nonmetro Latino immigrants. Rural Sociology, 76(1), 101–128.
Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE). Illinois Report Card (2023-2024). 2024 Report Card
Public Data Set https://www.isbe.net/pages/illinois-state-report-card-data.aspx
Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-165.
Lee, S. J., & Hawkins, M. (2015). Policy, context and schooling: The education of English
learners in rural new destinations. Global Education Review, 2(4), 40-59.
Majka, T., & Majka, L. (2011). Institutional obstacles to incorporation: Latino immigrant
experiences in a mid-size rustbelt city. In R. Martinez (Ed.), Latinos in the Midwest (pp. 87-118). Michigan State Press.
Martinez Negrette, G. (2020). Immigration patterns and history of Latin@s in the Midwest:
Educational implications & future considerations. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal,1-20.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). English Learners in Public Schools. Condition of Education.U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgf.
Pendola, A., & Fuller, E. J. (2018). Principal stability and the rural divide. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(1), 1–20.
Ruecker, T. (2020). The impact of neoliberal evaluation systems on rural schools, teachers, and their bilingual learners. Educational Policy, 36(6), 1288–1314.
Schaefer, M., et al. (2016). Examining the generalisability of the Simple View of Reading comprehension for emergent bilinguals. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education.
Soltero, S., Garibay-Mulattieri, K., & Vonderlack-Navarro, R. (2019). What every school leader needs to know about English learners. Illinois School Board Journal, 87(6), 20–24.
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2012). Dual language education for a transformed world. Albuquerque, NM: Dual Language Education of New Mexico/Fuente Press.
Tieken, M. C. (2017). The spatialization of racial inequity and educational opportunity: Rethinking the rural/urban divide. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(3), 385–404
Yun, J. T., & Kinkley, I. C. (2019). Student Population Change in Rural Illinois Schools and Its Implications for School Leaders. The Rural Educator, 40(1), 45-62.
About the author
Giselle Martinez Negrette, Ph.D. is Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
