A hearing turned fiery and personal when House Democrats clashed with Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. One lawmaker said DeVos is "out to destroy public education."
Democrats, DeVos Clash In Fiery Hearing
Proceedings Turned Personal
By COLLIN BINKLEY AP Education Writer
House Democrats clashed with Education Secretary Betsy DeVos in a Thursday hearing that nearly spun out of control when one lawmaker called DeVos "the most unpopular person in our government" and said she's "out to destroy public education."
DeVos was facing the House's education committee to explain her overhaul of a federal program that erases loans for students who are cheated by their colleges. Some Democrats believe DeVos intentionally stalled the program for more than a year while she rewrote the rules and made it more difficult for students to get loan relief.
Several Democratic lawmakers had taken turns criticizing DeVos' handling of the program when it turned personal. Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Fla., said DeVos is the first political opponent she has encountered who is "out to destroy public education."
"When you approach a public school, you are protested. When you enter, you are booed," Wilson said. "You are the most unpopular person in our government. Millions will register to vote in 2020. Many will vote to remove you more than to remove the president."
DeVos did not immediately respond, but the remark drew quick condemnation from Republicans. Rep. Virginia Foxx, the ranking Republican, interrupted to call the comment "absolutely over the line," saying it would not have been allowed on the House floor. Another Republican tried unsuccessfully to get the remarks removed from the record.
After the hearing, the Education Department issued a statement calling the hearing "a cheap political show trial designed to personally attack and denigrate the Secretary of Education."
"It was unprofessional, it was outside of the rules of the House, and it set a terrible example for America's young students who watched those shameless attacks. Our nation's elected leaders should do better," spokeswoman Angela Morabito said.
After the chamber settled, lawmakers returned to the original topic and questioned DeVos for more than an hour more. Republicans applauded her work while Democrats blasted her handling of the program, which has become a central dispute in her ongoing feud with the party.
The program, known as borrower defense to repayment, is meant to forgive federal loans for students whose colleges misrepresent the quality of their education or otherwise commit fraud.
It was expanded under the Obama administration to help clear loans for thousands of students who attended Corinthian Colleges, a for-profit college chain that collapsed in 2015 amid allegations that it lied about the success of its graduates in order to get students to enroll.
Soon after, thousands of additional claims were coming from students who attended other for-profit colleges, including defunct chains such as ITT Technical College. But after the Trump administration took office, the process ground to a halt. Loans were no longer being discharged, and a pool of 60,000 pending claims ballooned to more than 200,000.
Democrats have been seeking answers about the backlog for more than a year but say the Education Department has refused to cooperate. DeVos agreed last month to face the House education committee after Democrats threatened to issue a congressional subpoena forcing her appearance.
At the hearing, DeVos shifted much of the blame to the Obama administration. She said she inherited thousands of pending claims and no clear guidance on how to process them. Her predecessors had simply been approving all claims of fraud, she said, leaving it to her to devise a fair way to judge applications.
"Yes, there is a backlog of borrower defense claims," DeVos said. "To say that I am frustrated by that is an understatement. But rather than focus on why there is a backlog, too many have instead focused on creating more chaos and a circus-like atmosphere."
Earlier this week, DeVos unveiled a new method for judging claims that she says will help clear the backlog. It's meant to provide varying levels of loan forgiveness based on the degree of financial harm a student suffers.
Full forgiveness will be granted only to students from programs that produce graduates with median incomes far below their peers in other similar programs. Other defrauded students can get 25% to 75% of their debt erased, depending on the median income of the program they attended.
It's a departure from the Obama administration, which provided full loan relief in all cases of fraud, and it drew outrage from Democrats, who said it's based on flawed statistical methods that will leave many cheated students repaying some portion of their loans.
"Those defrauded borrowers have been left with mountains of debt, worthless degrees and none of the job opportunities they were promised," Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., chairman of the House education committee, said Thursday. "Defrauded borrowers have been cheated twice: First by their college, and then by a Department of Education that refuses to make them whole."
DeVos said she disagrees with opponents who want to give "blanket forgiveness for just anyone who raises their hand and files a claim." She said many applications are based on allegations so dubious that "your jaw would drop if you actually read" the reasoning.
Republicans backed DeVos through the hearing, saying she's making sure taxpayers only cover students' college debt if they were actually financially harmed. Foxx said the accusations that DeVos purposefully delayed relief are unfair.
"Secretary DeVos is putting reforms in place that will help defrauded students navigate the process of getting the loan relief they deserve," Foxx said. "Committee Republicans are supportive of these efforts."
___
Follow Collin Binkley on Twitter at https://twitter.com/cbinkley
Hispanic Outlook is an education magazine in the US available both in print and digital form. Visit https://www.hispanicoutlook.com/education-magazine for information about our latest issue, including our new supplement Physician Outlook.
Hispanic Outlook’s Job Board allows applicants to search for jobs by category, by city and by state. Both Featured and Latest Job Positions are available at https://hispanicoutlookjobs.com/
And for employers, Hispanic Outlook’s Job Board offers a wide variety of posting options. Further information is available at https://hispanicoutlookjobs.com/employer-products/
Other articles from Hispanic Outlook:
Diversify Or Decline
Most people believe diversity in our society is a worthy goal. It seems a particularly sensible one for a nation established and built by individuals from a wide variety of backgrounds. But how to achieve and sustain it?...A bit of history. For centuries the privileged class took steps to ensure their success and those of their male offspring. The well-established old boy network was in many ways an efficient system that worked for those who ran it, primarily WASPS (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). Admission to college, employment offers and promotion opportunities were heavily influenced by who you knew, who recommend you. But the well-oiled network had fatal flaws. It was insular, extremely restrictive and self-serving. It was great for those connected males, and in the past, males were the preferred gender for sure. But what about everybody else? Vast numbers of under-served ethnic, religious or national groups didn’t have a chance. The playing field was painfully uneven. The cards were stacked against hundreds of thousands of Americans if not millions be it for education or employment opportunities. Finally, in the 1960s affirmative action was…
Read full article here
Judging Good-Looking Employees As Bad
(AP)(THE CONVERSATION) Beautiful people tend to have a lot more luck in the work world. Research has shown people deemed attractive get paid more, receive better job evaluations and are generally more employable. It’s even been shown that good-looking CEOs bring better stock returns for their companies. In part, this may be because companies believe consumers are more likely to buy things from beautiful employees, which is perhaps why retailers like Abercrombie & Fitch have used looks as criteria in their hiring process. Abercrombie says it stopped doing that in 2015. There’s some evidence, however, that this worker “beauty premium” may be wearing off – at least when it comes to employees who interact with consumers. In television commercials, for example, retailers and other companies are increasingly using real people – with all their physical flaws – rather than photoshopped models to give their brands an “authentic” feel. Research several colleagues and I conducted recently suggests that companies may be wise to...
Read full article here
New Grads Reveal A Confidence Gender Gap
For perhaps the first and only time in a person’s professional life where they are competing in a somewhat level playing field is as a freshly minted college graduate. If your grades are comparable and you are competing in the same field as your fellow graduate, you should be just as confident about landing a coveted job as he or she might be. But a study of recent college graduates reveals that this is not necessarily so. You point of view, it turns out, is very much affected by what gender you are. The survey, conducted as part of the Cengage Student Opportunity Index, shows that while recent college graduates feel good about their job prospects, women are much less confident than men when it comes to salary expectations. Women are also significantly less optimistic than men about the country’s economic outlook, with a majority reporting they feel the country is on the wrong track. And these concerns are not unreasonable. The fact that we are a society that is ideologically divided over the question of equal pay for equal work and statistics that…
Read full article here
2 Physicians Personalize Vaccine Debate
In the year 2000, the national vaccination rate was 90% to 95%. Measles was declared officially eliminated in this country. However, since that time an anti-vaccine movement has sprung up internationally, which has lowered the percentage of children vaccinated at levels that are alarming the medical community. Earlier this year, there was a surge of measles cases in Washington State. The vaccination rate across Clark County, Wash. was 78%, but some schools in the area have had rates under 40%, according to the Clark County Public Health website. Washington State legislators introduced bills to deny parents refusing to vaccinate their children for personal and philosophical reasons. Washington was one of only 17 states that allowed for that exemption. The bills, supporters explained, was to prevent a full-blown epidemic in the Pacific Northwest. After a contentious debate and hearings, the bills were passed and signed into law by Governor Jay Inslee. What follows are the views of two Physicians who have been personally touched by...
Read full article here
Using Crowdsourcing To Diagnose Patients
It’s no surprise that the internet has changed the practice of Medicine. TeleMedicine is now being recognized by major insurance carriers and medical facilities as a viable option for Patients. Physicians routinely consult and exchange files on line. Patients can access their medical files and history through laboratory and hospital websites. But now crowdsourcing has taken Medicine to a whole new level. A new series on Netflix explores how Physicians can harness the power of the internet to better treat their Patients and provide a window into the entire diagnosis process. The series, “Diagnosis,” explores the life-changing impact of receiving a diagnosis for individuals who’ve been searching for answers, and the healing that comes with connecting with others who can empathize with their experiences. Based on Dr. Lisa Sanders’ column in The New York Times Magazine, “Diagnosis” follows various Patients on their respective journeys toward finding a diagnosis, and potentially a cure, for their mysterious illnesses. By combining the power of…
Read full article here
