Under new Education Department rules defrauded students will only receive full loan forgiveness if they earn far less than their peers and may receive relief 25%-75% of their debt.
Only Partial Loan Relief For Students?
Defrauded Students May Receive 25%-75% Relief Of Debt
By COLLIN BINKLEY AP Education Writer
Students who are cheated by their colleges will receive full loan forgiveness only if they end up earning far less than their peers, while others will receive relief between 25% and 75% of their debt under new rules unveiled Tuesday by the U.S. Education Department.
The policy is a departure from the Obama administration, which provided full loan forgiveness in cases of fraud, and it marks the second time the Trump administration has attempted to provide only partial loan relief. A federal court blocked a previous attempt in 2018 after it determined the Education Department violated privacy laws to gather income information.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said the new policy provides a fair resolution to the "mess" inherited from the previous administration.
"We cannot tolerate fraud in higher education, nor can we tolerate furiously giving away taxpayer money to those who have submitted a false claim or aren't eligible for relief," DeVos said in a statement.
The policy devises a new formula to determine how much federal debt students should have erased under the department's Borrower Defense program. The Obama administration expanded the program in 2016 to forgive debt for thousands of students harmed by the Corinthian Colleges chain, which shut down following findings that it had lied to students about job placement rates.
Since then, thousands of other students have applied for loan forgiveness after saying they were cheated by their schools, mostly for-profit colleges. But DeVos has been reluctant to provide full relief. In a call with reporters Tuesday, her principal deputy under secretary said the forgiveness program had become a "backdoor" route to free college.
"We want to make sure we really serve the borrowers who truly have been the victim of misrepresentation and harmed by it," Diane Auer Jones said. "We wanted to protect the taxpayers. There are people who believe we should forgive 100% but where does that end?"
The new formula attempts to quantify the harm done to a student by comparing their estimated earnings to those from similar programs at other schools across the country.
If the median earnings in their program is more than two standards of deviation below the median at comparable programs, students are eligible for full relief. Others will get either 25%, 50% or 75% of their debt erased depending on the median income in the program they attended.
The policy immediately drew fire from critics who say defrauded students deserve full loan forgiveness.
"The department is inventing another scheme to provide students less relief than the law allows," said Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., chairman of the House's education committee. "It should not be controversial that victims of predatory schools deserve meaningful relief. The department's continued resistance to making defrauded students whole is mystifying."
The Project on Predatory Student Lending, a legal advocacy group based at Harvard University, said cheated students are entitled to full relief.
"This partial denial scheme will force thousands of families to pay fraudulent debts that never should have existed in the first place. It shows that the Department of Education will stop at nothing to try to extract payments on invalid debts and deny students their rights under law," said Eileen Connor, the group's legal director.
The Education Department says former Corinthian Colleges students that had their claims approved by the Obama administration will get full loan forgiveness. Other Corinthian students will be entitled to at least 10% forgiveness.
Amid a legal battle over the loan forgiveness policy, the department had previously stopped discharging loans, leading to a backlog of more than 200,000 claims.
A federal judge in 2018 ordered DeVos to stop using a different partial relief formula after ruling it violated the Privacy Act when exchanging information with the Social Security Administration. Department officials say the issue has been resolved,and the new formula will use "publicly available" data gathered by the Education Department, the Social Security Administration and the IRS.
DeVos is announcing the change as she faces heavy criticism over her handling of the debt forgiveness program. A federal judge recently held her in contempt of court and fined her agency $100,000 after finding it collected payments from former Corinthian students in violation of a previous order.
At the same time, Democrats in Congress recently threatened to subpoena DeVos to explain her handling of the Borrower Defense program. Instead she agreed to face the House's education committee at a hearing scheduled for Thursday.
Hispanic Outlook is an education magazine in the US available both in print and digital form. Visit https://www.hispanicoutlook.com/education-magazine for information about our latest issue, including our new supplement Physician Outlook.
Hispanic Outlook’s Job Board allows applicants to search for jobs by category, by city and by state. Both Featured and Latest Job Positions are available at https://hispanicoutlookjobs.com/
And for employers, Hispanic Outlook’s Job Board offers a wide variety of posting options. Further information is available at https://hispanicoutlookjobs.com/employer-products/
Other articles from Hispanic Outlook:
Diversify Or Decline
Most people believe diversity in our society is a worthy goal. It seems a particularly sensible one for a nation established and built by individuals from a wide variety of backgrounds. But how to achieve and sustain it?...A bit of history. For centuries the privileged class took steps to ensure their success and those of their male offspring. The well-established old boy network was in many ways an efficient system that worked for those who ran it, primarily WASPS (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). Admission to college, employment offers and promotion opportunities were heavily influenced by who you knew, who recommend you. But the well-oiled network had fatal flaws. It was insular, extremely restrictive and self-serving. It was great for those connected males, and in the past, males were the preferred gender for sure. But what about everybody else? Vast numbers of under-served ethnic, religious or national groups didn’t have a chance. The playing field was painfully uneven. The cards were stacked against hundreds of thousands of Americans if not millions be it for education or employment opportunities. Finally, in the 1960s affirmative action was…
Read full article here
Judging Good-Looking Employees As Bad
(AP)(THE CONVERSATION) Beautiful people tend to have a lot more luck in the work world. Research has shown people deemed attractive get paid more, receive better job evaluations and are generally more employable. It’s even been shown that good-looking CEOs bring better stock returns for their companies. In part, this may be because companies believe consumers are more likely to buy things from beautiful employees, which is perhaps why retailers like Abercrombie & Fitch have used looks as criteria in their hiring process. Abercrombie says it stopped doing that in 2015. There’s some evidence, however, that this worker “beauty premium” may be wearing off – at least when it comes to employees who interact with consumers. In television commercials, for example, retailers and other companies are increasingly using real people – with all their physical flaws – rather than photoshopped models to give their brands an “authentic” feel. Research several colleagues and I conducted recently suggests that companies may be wise to...
Read full article here
